
Testing quality control samples is routine in the clinical laboratory but typically these are precision controls that monitor only the reproducibility (random error) of an assay and not trueness/bias (systematic error). To assess bias, accuracy controls that address both systematic error (trueness) and random error (precision) are needed. A properly prepared trueness control can be used to assess both bias and precision, as accuracy is defined by both random and systematic error. Providers of reference materials, such as metrology institutes and manufacturers are best suited to provide accuracy controls.
Quality Control, Bias, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reference Values, Calibration, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Laboratories
Quality Control, Bias, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reference Values, Calibration, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Laboratories
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
