Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical significance of CA19-9 in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients with elevated preoperative serum CA19-9.

Authors: Shung-Haur, Yang; Jeng-Kai, Jiang; Shih-Ching, Chang; Chi-Jung, Juang; Jen-Kou, Lin;

Clinical significance of CA19-9 in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients with elevated preoperative serum CA19-9.

Abstract

We hypothesized an advantage of using carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) over carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with elevated preoperative serum CA19-9 (PreCA19-9).We analyzed 197 CRC patients with elevated PreCA19-9 (>=37U/mL). Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were monitored postoperatively, according to standard protocol. IndexCEA and IndexCA19-9 were defined as the levels of CEA and CA19-9, respectively, recorded at recurrence confirmation or at the last follow-up of non-recurrence.There were 56 recurrences during follow-up. IndexCA19-9 (cut-off, 38.6U/mL) had better sensitivity (0.80 vs. 0.68) and specificity (0.87 vs. 0.83) than did IndexCEA (cut-off. 2.8ng/mL). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis revealed that although IndexCA19-9 (0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.95) had better coverage than IndexCEA (0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90), there was no significant difference (p=0.085). With the progressive rising of PreCA19-9 levels, we observed the trend of better AUC performance of IndexCA19-9 over IndexCEA. At a cut-off of 42U/mL for PreCA19-9, IndexCA19-9 began to have significantly better coverage than IndexCEA (p=0.027).The surveillance advantage of CA19-9 over CEA was shown in the group of patients with preoperative CA19-9 levels >42U/mL.

Keywords

Adult, Male, CA-19-9 Antigen, Middle Aged, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Area Under Curve, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!