Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio Istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Single-crystal HT X-ray diffraction study of anthophyllite.

Authors: CAMARA ARTIGAS, Fernando; Welch M. D; Oberti R.;

Single-crystal HT X-ray diffraction study of anthophyllite.

Abstract

The crystal chemistry of amphiboles is now well understood. However, very little is known about their physical properties, such as compressibility and thermal expansivity [1], both of which are fundamental to mineral stability. Of the few published expansivity data, all are for monoclinic amphiboles, including cummingtonite, tremolite and richterite and recently also pargasite [2]. There are no data for orthorhombic amphiboles. Furthermore, rapid disordering of divalent cations between M(1,2,3,4) sites in monoclinic amphiboles on heating has been observed in situ to occur within 2–4 hours at T ~ 300 – 700°C [3,4]. Beyond 600°C, dehydrogenation has been also observed [2]. The absence of thermal expansivity data for orthorhombic amphiboles and the possibility of in situ disordering of cations led us to undertake a high-temperature diffraction experiment on anthophyllite. A gem-quality Mg-rich crystal of anthophyllite coming from American Museum of Natural History (AMNH 34856) with composition ANa0.05 B(Mg1.34Mn0.56Ca0.09) C(Mg4.98Fe0.02) T(Si7.97 Al0.03) O22 (OH1.99F0.01) was studied by single-crystal XRD. Data were collected in situ using a micro furnace. Lattice parameters were refined at intervals of 25 K in the T range 298-1073 K; intensity data were collected at 298, 473, 673, 873, 973 and 1073 K. Above 973 K a homogeneous contraction in volume is observed which is related to dehydrogenation accompanied by a increase in mosaicity indicating the decomposition of the crystal. Thermal expansivities for V, a, b, c were obtained by fitting the equation V(T) = VTe !" #T-Tr)]: V = 3.668(3) !10-5 K-1, a = 1.49(1) !10-5 K-1, b = 0.969(2) !10-5 K-1, c = 1.206(9) !10-5 K-1. These values are the highest observed so far for amphibole. Thermal expansion is thus anisotropic with a: b: c = 1.53:1:1.24, with a larger expansion in the (010) plane, essentially along [100]. This behaviour contrasts with the chemically similar but monoclinic manganoan cummingtonite [2] which shows a lower c, although b values are almost the same in both monoclinic and orthorhombic structures. Structure refinements show that, after correcting for thermal motion, while tetrahedra behave as rigid units up to 1073 K, C-group octahedra expand at the same rate within experimental error ( M1,2,3 = 5(2) !10-5 K-1), whereas M(4) expands more ( M4 = 7.8(3.1) !10-5 K-1). A change in rate is observed in the c parameter which starts around 700 K and coincides with disordering of Mn from the B to the C sites in agreement to previous observations in manganocummingtonite [3]. However, on disordering at high-T in anthophyllite, the Mn2+ site preference is M(1,2) > M(3), in contrast with M(2) > M(1,3) reported by [3] in manganoan cumingtonite and also with M(1,3) $" M(2) found in richterite [4]. This result indicates that the composition of M(4) is more constraining than topology in determining the thermal behaviour of amphibole.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Anthophyllite; X-ray diffraction; high-temperature

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!