
handle: 2318/2064850
In this paper, after trying to show why this solution of the problem of amodal completion does not work in any of its variants, I will claim that the experience of the object as a whole is genuinely perceptual as it seems. For I will appeal to a difference between a sensuous component, presentational character, and a non-sensuous component, feeling of presence, of the phenomenal character of that experience: while the hidden facets or the occluded parts of the experienced object do not contribute to the presentational character of the perceptual experience of thatobject, the fact that in the overall phenomenal character of one’s perceptual experience the object is non-sensuously felt as present explains why one perceptually experiences it as a whole. Finally, I will try to show how my account easily solves a paradox of perception, precisely by applying the distinction between presentational character and feeling of presence.
amodal completion, imagination, perception, feeling of presence
amodal completion, imagination, perception, feeling of presence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
