
handle: 2318/1669918
Weed control is one the main issues in organic rice cultivation. Rice transplanting can favor rice competition against weeds and allow weed control with inter-row tillage. A two year project started in 2016 aimed at evaluating the possibility of applying mechanical rice transplanting in Italy. Rice was mechanically transplanted on 66 hectares included in 24 rice farms involved in the study, all located in Lombardia region. Seedlings were grown in a nursery following the »mat method«, in which about 4,700 rice seeds were sown in a single tray of 60 x 30 cm, filled with a potting mix. About 200 trays were necessary to transplant a single hectare. Trays were sown with nine different rice varieties: Brio, Cammeo, Centauro, Cerere, Ronaldo, Selenio, Spillo, Venere and the hybrid variety Ecco 63. Seedlings were transplanted at 2-3 leaf stage with a self-propelled riding type transplanter, able to transplant 8 rows of rice simultaneously. The transplanting distance between rows was 30 cm, while the spacing between plant hills within the row was 17 cm. The transplanted plant hills consisted of 2 to 6 plants. The transplanting operations were conducted between mid-May and end of June. Weed control was carried out with a prototype rear-mounted inter-row hoeing machine, designed to work on saturated soil. Fields were weeded once, at about 30 days after transplanting. During the season, weed infestation was monitored in three transplanted fields, while rice yield was assessed in all the fields. The growth advantage given to rice by transplanting and the inter-row hoeing were not able to completely suppress weeds. Weed density ranged from 65.4 plants m-2 (hybrid variety) to 131.2 plants m-2 (Selenio). Rice yield showed high variability, with values ranging from 2.6 t ha-1 (Venere) to 6.2 t ha-1 (hybrid variety Ecco 63).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
