Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio Istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Performance of a urine dipstick test in detecting proteinuric dogs

Authors: RIONDATO, Fulvio; ZANATTA, Renato; FALCO, SARA; MINISCALCO, Barbara;

Performance of a urine dipstick test in detecting proteinuric dogs

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice the detection of proteinuria in dogs relies on protein determination by urine dipstick tests. However, to confirm results and to quantify proteinuria, urine must be sent to external laboratories for protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) assessment. Objective: To assess the ability of Cliniteck Microalbumin 9 reagent strips (CM9; Siemens) to detect proteinuric dogs. Methods: Sixty-one samples were tested. In addition to proteins, CM9 provides semi-quantitative concentration of albumin (10, 30, 80, 150 mg/L), albumin to creatinine ratio (UAC; negative, 30–300, 4300 mg/g), and UPC (negative, 300, 1,500, 3,000, Z5,000 mg/g). UPC was determined also by quantitative reference method and 0.2 was used as the cutoff to identify proteinuric dogs. Ability to detect proteinuric dogs was evaluated for the following CM9 parameters: protein (protUSG); UPC; and UAC. Samples were interpreted as proteinuric when protein Z21or protein Z11and USG " 1.012 (Zatelli et al. 2010), UPCZ300 mg/g and UACZ30 mg/g. Results: protUSG, UPC, and UAC yielded respectively: accuracy 80.3%, 75.4%, and 85.2%; sensitivity 79.5%, 89.7%, and 94.9%; specificity 81.8%, 50%, and 68.2%; positive (and negative) predictive value 88.6% (69.2%), 76.1% (73.3%), and 84.1% (88.2%); and diagnostic odds ratio 15; 8.75, and 39.64. Agreement with reference UPC was 0.56 (protUSG), 0.427 (UPC), and 0.663 (UAC). Negative UAC result was reliable (correctly excluding proteinuria) when USG41.012. Positive UAC result was reliable (correctly identifying proteinuria) when UAC4300 or UAC= 30–300 with albumin = 150 and/or UPCZ1,500 and/or USGZ1,030. Conclusions: UAC provided the highest performances with exception of specificity (higher for protUSG). UAC results from Cliniteck Microalbumin 9 reagent strips can improve correct identification of proteinuric dogs in clinical practice. Exact quantitative determination of UPC is still mandatory in some cases of UACo30 and UAC= 30–300.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!