
handle: 2318/100138
Peter Laslett’s choice to concentrate Household and family in past time exclusively on relationships within the co-residential domestic group is held by his critics to have been responsible for encouraging family historians to overlook kinship relations extending beyond the household. Evidence from historical research on the Italian family has often been used by these critics to argue that households were not self-sufficient units of analysis and could be understood only in the context of wider social networks. This article surveys the literature on family and kinship in Italy and shows that the interpretations offered by several leading historians have been strongly influenced by anthropological approaches focused on the study of ‘horizontal’ kinship ties and the manipulation of social networks. Such a theoretical stance may have somehow obscured the significance, in many parts of historic Italy, of ‘vertical’ ties producing lineage-like kinship groups.
Households; Social networks; Kinship groups; Italy.
Households; Social networks; Kinship groups; Italy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
