Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Surgical procedure and urologic complications after 922 kidney transplantations: our experience].

Authors: Anton, Maricić; Petar, Orlić; Maksim, Valencić; Romano, Oguić; Stanislav, Sotosek; Dean, Markić; Josip, Spanjol; +3 Authors

[Surgical procedure and urologic complications after 922 kidney transplantations: our experience].

Abstract

Between January 30 1971 and January 30 2011 922 kidney transplants were performed at our center, 360 (39%) from living related donor and 562 (61%) from cadaver. During first eight years an ureteroureterostomy was routinely used. The notable incidence of urological complications (fistula 11%, complications of stenting 10.7%, stenosis and lithiasis 4%) was observed after 140 transplantations. Majority of these complications (60%) were treated conservatively. A significant reduction in this incidence (P<0.001) was achieved (fistula 1,28%, complications of stenting 0,26%, lithiasis 0.12%) by introducing an extravesical ureteroneocystostomy by Lich-Gregoire. Stenosis had the highest incidence (4,23%). Majority of complications (76%) were treated surgically. A native ureter was commonly used in replacing the transplant ureter. In majority of patients an end-to-end pyelo(uretero)stomy was performed. Two patients were reoperated because of fistula, and the third had a prolonged healing. In last nine patients with urological complications an end-to-side pyelo(uretero)stomy was done. There was no urinary leakage. The safety of method results probably from an intact native ureter which has normal blood irrigation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Urologic Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Anastomosis, Surgical, Humans, Stents, Ureter, Kidney Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!