Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Reap the rewards of a non-targeted HIV screening program.

Reap the rewards of a non-targeted HIV screening program.

Abstract

Administrative hurdles, costs, and provider resistance have prevented many EDs from implementing the kind of nontargeted HIV screening that the CDC recommends. However, some of the hospitals that have successfully negotiated through these obstacles are having a positive impact on their communities, identifying cases of HIV at a time when many of the downstream complications and costs can be prevented. Further, once an infrastructure is in place to support HIV screening, it can be used for other purposes as well. Since the ED at the University of Alabama at Birmingham implemented non-targeted HIV screening a year ago, the process has identified 72 patients with HIV and linked them into care. Administrators caution that it is imperative to identify resources for follow-up care before HIV testing begins; otherwise the benefits of testing will be lost. Experts advise EDs to make testing as routine as possible so that patients will agree to undergo HIV tests. At UAB, triage nurses explain to all patients that the HIV test will be conducted unless they choose to decline the test.The decline rate is only 13%. New, fourth-generation testing platforms have reduced the per-test costs by more than half, and can deliver results within 30 minutes.

Keywords

HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Mass Screening, Program Development, Emergency Service, Hospital, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!