Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scandinavian Journal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The placebo effect revisited.

Authors: Andersen, JH; Mikkelsen, Sigurd;

The placebo effect revisited.

Abstract

Andersen et al (1) recently published data from a study on brief daily exercise and headache. They reported that a 10-week intervention with 2 minutes of daily exercise using an elastic tube caused a decrease in headache frequency from 1.4 to 0.9 days per week, a 40 % reduction. Very similar results were found for 12 minutes of daily exercise, but not in a control group. No decrease was seen in intensity of headache. A biological background for such a remarkable effect of 10 minutes of training per week does not seem very plausible to us. The authors did not discuss alternative explanations of their findings, for example a placebo effect. In another paper about the same intervention, the authors found that 2 minutes of daily exercise reduced neck/shoulder pain intensity with 1.4 scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0–10 (2) and stated that an effect of this size exceeds the expected effect in response to placebo. The effect size (standardized mean difference) for placebo effects on pain has been shown to be around 0.3 (5) and 0.5 (3) in general, and around 0.8 in 3-armed trials (3). The effect size of 2 and 12 minutes of daily exercise on shoulder/neck pain was approximately 0.5 in the study by Andersen et al (2). However, reported placebo effect sizes vary quite a lot between studies (2, 3). Average placebo effects, therefore, may not apply to a specific study. Each study should be scrutinized for potential placebo effects specific to that study. Expectations are an important factor for placebo effects (4). In the 3-armed trial by Andersen et al, the control group would have no expectations, but the two treatment groups were prone to expectations. Furthermore, larger effects of placebo were found in studies of physical interventions and studies where the outcome was based on participant reporting and cooperation (5).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, commentary, exercise, Headache, workplace intervention, randomized control trial, physical exercise, placebo effect, Humans, tension headache, Female, secondary analysis, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, headache, Exercise

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average