
handle: 2268/332689
Animal communicators worldwide employ intuitive interspecies communication (IIC) to engage in detailed, two-way communication with nonhuman animals. IIC's potential for doing research with rather than on animals has been insufficiently explored, due to contingent onto-epistemological biases. Cooperating with animal communicators as interpreters, pilot interviews with felines were conducted. Challenges included clearly filtering the animals' voices and bridging ontological divides and communication modes. Nevertheless, the interviews produced clear, distinct, and consistent responses, challenging and confronting both animal communicators and the researcher to reflect on their perspectives, expectations and assumptions. Engaging animals as research participants through IIC simultaneously unsettles hierarchical divides between humans and other animals, as well as between different ways of knowing. IIC can support researchers and (non)human participants in the co-creation of novel methodological multispecies strategies that form a practical counterpart to the largely theoretical explorations of the ontological and species turns, and further multivocality in academia.
Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, Indigenous paradigms, Sociology and Political Science, animal communicators, multispecies methods, ontological turn, Anthropologie, interspecies communication, intuition, Philosophy, decolonization of knowledge, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Anthropology, Veterinary (all), human-animal relations
Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, Indigenous paradigms, Sociology and Political Science, animal communicators, multispecies methods, ontological turn, Anthropologie, interspecies communication, intuition, Philosophy, decolonization of knowledge, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Anthropology, Veterinary (all), human-animal relations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
