Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Open Repository and ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Goalkeepers: main injuries

Authors: Kaux, Jean-François; Gramage Medina, Kevin; Letiexhe, Antoine; Delvaux, François; Schwartz, Cédric; Forthomme, Bénédicte; Croisier, Jean-Louis;

Goalkeepers: main injuries

Abstract

Introduction: Goalkeepers are important players in a football team. They have different physical characteristics and abilities than other players. Goalkeepers are different players, so they are exposed to different types of injuries. The aim of this article is to analyse and summarize the risks and injuries of football goalkeepers. Methods: A literature search was conducted using a database (PubMed) and relevant keywords (in English and French) such as goalkeeper, prevention and football injuries. The majority of the articles used as references in our work were published in the last decade (1). Results: In summary, studies have shown that current goalkeepers have a lower injury rate than field players (Table 1). In adults, the injury rate is 4.6 per 1000 hours played for goalkeepers and 7.6 per 1000 hours played for other players (p0.001) (2). For goalkeepers, an upper limb injury (e.g. finger sprain) will penalise them much more than an outfield player and their absence from the game will be longer (Table 2). Goalkeepers also have a higher rate of trunk and head injuries. The study also showed that injuries are more common during games (12.1 per 1000 hours played) than during training (3.5 per 1000 hours played) and that goalkeepers are more likely to be injured during the pre-season due to the accumulation of training and the lack of physical preparation of players. Goalkeepers are more likely to be injured by non-contact mechanisms, such as sprinting, passing and shooting at goal, but also have a higher risk of injury from contact with objects, such as goalposts or the ball. The quality of the playing surface was also a factor, with artificial turf being associated with a higher injury rate than natural turf (88.5% versus 11.5% for acute and overuse injuries, p<0.0001). Artificial turf is known to be harder, less forgiving and less stable than natural grass, which may increase the risk of injury to players, particularly goalkeepers who are more likely to dive and make contact with the ground. In addition, the most common types of injury on artificial turf are ligament sprains, bruises and abrasions. However, it is worth mentioning that despite the higher injury rate associated with artificial turf, it has several advantages, such as the ability to withstand heavy use and the possibility of playing in all weather conditions, which makes it a popular choice for many football clubs and organisations. Conclusion: Goalkeepers have fewer injuries overall than field players but more upper limb injuries, which is related to their sporting demands. These observations open up perspectives on the prevention of goalkeeper-specific injuries.

Country
Belgium
Keywords

Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine, Human health sciences, Sciences de la santé humaine, Orthopédie, rééducation & médecine sportive

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!