
handle: 2262/79086
The purpose of this research is to analyse, primarily by reference to the written judgments delivered in the Superior Courts, the development of the anti-dismissal injunction and associated complexities which can lead to a lack of coherent principles in the courts’ approach to such injunctions. This analysis can be divided into four sub-strands: (i) to consider the anti-dismissal injunction in the round and set out the basis for the courts’ approach to the remedy; (ii) to identify established principles which inform the granting or refusal of such injunctions; (iii) to identify where and why there is a lack of coherence and uncertainty in the courts’ approach to such injunctions; and (iv) to identify what might tentatively be called “starting points” for a reconsideration of how best the extraordinarily powerful remedy of the anti-dismissal injunction might be approached by the courts.
TARA (Trinity’s Access to Research Archive) has a robust takedown policy. Please contact us if you have any concerns: rssadmin@tcd.ie
Ph.D, 340, 330, Law, Ph.D., Ph.D. Trinity College Dublin, Law
Ph.D, 340, 330, Law, Ph.D., Ph.D. Trinity College Dublin, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
