Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Tolerance of porous polyethylene orbital implants in children].

Authors: I, Benatiya Andaloussi; S, Bhallil; M, Abdellaoui; F, Chraibi; H, Tahri;

[Tolerance of porous polyethylene orbital implants in children].

Abstract

The purpose of our study is to determine the incidence of orbital complications that occurred after insertion of orbital porous polyethylene implant in children under the age of 15 years.We report a series of 21 eyes of 21 patients younger than 15 years and in which a porous polyethylene implant is used for reconstruction of the orbital cavity after enucleation between January 2003 and December 2008.All patients were operated on by the same surgeon using the same technique.These 11 boys and 10 girls, whose average age is 5.7 years. Histopathologic diagnoses after enucleation are dominated by the retinoblastoma (10 eyes) and phthisis bulbi (6 eyes). After a mean follow up of 23 months it was observed two cases of implant extrusion in children enucleated for retinoblastoma. No cases of orbital cellulitis or enucleated syndrome have been reported.The most common complication of porous polyethylene implants in children is exposure. Risk factors may be related to surgical technique, infection, the implant, use of wrapping material and the association with adjuvant chemotherapy. Using a porous polyethylene implant uncovered remains an appropriate technique in children under 15 years for the reconstruction of the anophthalmic cavity, provided a rigorous surgical technique.

Keywords

Male, Adolescent, Incidence, Retinoblastoma, Tuberculosis, Ocular, Eye Enucleation, Equipment Failure Analysis, Postoperative Complications, Polyethylene, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Orbit, Follow-Up Studies, Orbital Implants

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!