
The study of comparison of NO2 SCD between two ground-based multi axis DOAS is introduced. The slant columns of NO2 from JAMASTEC are compared with those of AIOFM during the period from November to 31 December 2009. It says that the more signal to noise ratio is obtained by using the adjusted integral time rather than fixed settings; Two instrument show good accordance in the lower viewing angles, with the correlation coefficient of 0.995, but it becomes bad with higher viewing angles. The low deviation between the two instruments was achieved during the period from 9am to 17pm, the results in the 20 degree direction show best agreement with a deviation of 12%, but in other period the deviation becomes larger. The results in the visible range are better than those in the UV range, the residual in the fit decreases by more than 60%, and the results in the visible range show good agreements with those of AIOFM in the UV range during the whole day.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
