
To determine which is the most effective treatment for the management of soft tissues, the functional recovery and the healing of distal third humeral shaft fractures at the Mexican Red Cross trauma center.This is a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study of patients with a diagnosis of distal third humeral shaft fractures; clinical and radiographic follow-up was done with the MEPI, UCLA and Montoya functional scales at week 24.The results of patient follow-up using the MEPI in Group I were: 2 poor, 3 fair, 1 excellent; in Group II: 8 excellent; in Group III: 3 poor, 2 fair, 4 excellent; in Group IV: 1 poor, 5 fair and 2 excellent. The UCLA results were: Group I, 3 poor, 2 good, 2 excellent; Group II: 5 excellent, 2 good; Group III, 4 poor, 1 partial, 2 good and 2 excellent; Group IV, 4 partial, 2 good, 2 excellent. The results of the Montoya scale were: Group I, 3 stage II, 1 stage III, 2 stage IV; Group II, 3 stage III, 5 stage IV; Group III, 3 stage II, 5 stage III, 1 stage IV; Group IV, 2 stage II, 2 stage III, 4 stage IV.This paper shows that the anterior 4.5 mm LCP MI plate has been the best treatment for distal third humeral shaft fractures.
Adult, Male, Humeral Fractures, Adolescent, Soft Tissue Infections, Middle Aged, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Humeral Fractures, Adolescent, Soft Tissue Infections, Middle Aged, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
