Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Compare of misoprostol and dinoprost effectivity by induced second-trimester abortion].

Authors: O, Simetka; R, Spacek; P, Vasek; V, Lattová; I, Michalec; M, Procházka;

[Compare of misoprostol and dinoprost effectivity by induced second-trimester abortion].

Abstract

To compare the effectivity and safety of second-trimester abortion induced by two different types of prostaglandins.Retrospective study.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Olomouc.Retrospective analysis of 128 second trimester abortions induced by misoprostol and 82 second trimester abortions induced by dinoprost. Total length of abortion, failure of the method, need for instrumental revision of the uterine cavity, request for epidural analgesia and length of hospital stay were compared.In total 210 women were included. Misoprostol was used in 128 cases and dinoprost in 82 cases. The average gestational age was 18+1 in misoprostol group and 20+2 in dinoprost group. Ninety two percent of women with misoprostol aborted within 24 hours while in the dinoprost group it was 68%, withing 16 hours the number of completed abortions was 62% (misoprostol) versus 48% (dinoprost). The method failed in 2% of cases with misoprostol and 7% of cases with dinoprost.We conclude that induction of second-trimester abortion with the use of misoprostol is safe, quick, non-invasive and comfortable method with low frequency of complications and side effects.

Keywords

Adult, Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Humans, Abortion, Induced, Female, Dinoprost, Misoprostol

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!