
Bone substitutes are rarely used in the reconstruction of cleft lip and palate. The graft material of choice is cancellous bone, harvested in the hip or tibia. Tibial harvesting may lead to postoperative morbidity, or even complications. This has lead surgeons to develop alternative solution. We present a secondary alveolar bone grafting technique using synthetic calcium phosphate ceramics.A patient presenting with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate was treated by alveolar bone grafting at the age of nine years, using a mixture of autologous bone, harvested on the operative field, and particles of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP); the graft was included in a platelet rich plasma (PRP) gel. The patient was followed up for eight years after the procedure. No sign of early or late infection was observed. At the end of facial growth, the cuspid had erupted correctly in a safe periodontal environment. Sequential X-rays showed complete filling of the initial bone defect, progressive resorption of ceramics, and spontaneous eruption of the cuspid.In this long-term follow-up report, the use of BCP mixed with autologous bone did not interfere with dental eruption or maxilla growth. A second bone-harvesting site was thus avoided. BCP could be a suitable alternative to autologous bone graft for secondary alveoloplasty.
Calcium Phosphates, Male, Reoperation, Ceramics, Bone Transplantation, Adolescent, Cleft Lip, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Cleft Palate, Alveoloplasty, Bone Substitutes, Humans, Child, Follow-Up Studies
Calcium Phosphates, Male, Reoperation, Ceramics, Bone Transplantation, Adolescent, Cleft Lip, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Cleft Palate, Alveoloplasty, Bone Substitutes, Humans, Child, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
