Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Update on interstitial brachytherapy].

Authors: T, Bretschneider; N, Peters; P, Hass; J, Ricke;

[Update on interstitial brachytherapy].

Abstract

Minimally invasive treatment procedures, such as image-guided local tumour ablation have gained increasing relevance in oncologic concepts. Limitations of thermal ablation procedures have led to the development of percutaneous, computed tomography (CT) guided brachytherapy.Thermal ablation procedures, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) show limitations regarding maximum tumour size (<5 cm), cooling effects of adjacent vessels and surrounding risk structures.The image-guided interstitial brachytherapy allows the single application of high-dose rate (HDR) irradiation with an extensive protracted cytotoxic effect. Adjacent risk structures play a minor role due to the steep dose gradient outside the clinical target volume.Studies using CT-guided brachytherapy resulted in a local tumour control rate of approximately 90% after 12 months in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 70-90% in the treatment of colorectal metastases or cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Similar response rates were also seen in the treatment of metastases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or neuroendocrine tumours. In colorectal liver metastases and HCC the method has proven to have a positive impact on prognosis.In contrast to thermal ablation the method can be used without restriction with respect to tumour location. Cooling effects do not play a role. It has already been applied in more than 5,000 cases and it is used in clinical routine.Image-guided brachytherapy is safe and effective and has found its way into the clinical routine.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Brachytherapy, Liver Neoplasms, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!