
The well-known 5-HT(1A)/5-HT(7) selectivity issue was tackled by a new series of 4-aminoethylpiperazinyl aryl ketones (1a-1l) specifically designed to distinguish the two hydrophobic sites centered at the anchoring salt bridge. The 4-aminoethylpiperazinyl aryl ketones showed a wide spectrum of activity and selectivity for the 5-HT receptors depending on the type of the hydrophobic groups attached at the aryl piperazinyl ketone scaffold. Docking study of the most active compounds against 5-HT(7)R and 5-HT(1A)R revealed that both receptors have two hydrophobic pockets around the anchoring salt bridge. These two binding sites are perpendicular to each other in 5-HT(7)R but parallel in 5-HT(1A)R, and this observation is well matched with the previous report which claimed that 5-HT(7)R affinity arises from bent conformation of the bound ligand whereas an extended one is best suited for 5-HT(1A)R selectivity. Also, as these pockets have different size and shape, inhibitory activity as well as selectivity of the 4-aminoethylpiperazinyl aryl ketones against 5-HT(7)R and 5-HT(1A)R seemed to be determined by combination of two hydrophobic substituents attached at both ends of the title compounds.
Binding Sites, Ketones, Piperazines, Cell Line, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design, Receptors, Serotonin, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A, Humans, Computer Simulation, Serotonin Antagonists, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Protein Binding
Binding Sites, Ketones, Piperazines, Cell Line, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design, Receptors, Serotonin, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A, Humans, Computer Simulation, Serotonin Antagonists, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
