Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

LuxS distribution and AI-2 activity of Campylobacter spp.

Authors: G, Gölz; L, Adler; S, Huehn; T, Alter;

LuxS distribution and AI-2 activity of Campylobacter spp.

Abstract

This study investigates the distribution of LuxS within Campylobacter (Camp.) species and Autoinducer (AI)-2 activity of Camp. jejuni NCTC 11168 in food matrices. LuxS (S-ribosylhomocysteinase) sequences of different Campylobacter spp. were compared, and AI-2 activity was measured with an AI-2 reporter assay. Highest LuxS homologies were shared by Camp. jejuni, Camp. coli and Camp. upsaliensis, and their LuxS sequences had more similarities to the analysed Arcobacter and Vibrio harveyi strains than to all other analysed Campylobacter species. Of 15 analysed species only Camp. lari, Camp. peloridis and Camp. insulaenigrae did not produce AI-2 molecules. Cultivation of Camp. jejuni NCTC 11168 in chicken juice reduced AI-2 activity, and this reduction is not because of lower luxS expression or functionality.Not all Campylobacter species encode luxS. Food matrices can reduce AI-2 activity in a LuxS-independent manner.Besides, Camp. lari, Camp. peloridis and Camp. insulaenigrae do not show AI-2 activity. Further investigations should clarify the function of AI-2 in Campylobacter spp. and how species lacking luxS could overcome this alteration. Furthermore, the impact of food matrices on these functions needs to be determined as we could show that chicken juice reduced AI-2 activity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

DNA, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Campylobacter, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Carbon-Sulfur Lyases, Lactones, Bacterial Proteins, Consensus Sequence, Food Microbiology, Homoserine, Animals, Amino Acid Sequence, Chickens

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!