Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Total prosthesis arthroplasty in femur head necrosis].

Authors: R, Elke; E, Morscher;

[Total prosthesis arthroplasty in femur head necrosis].

Abstract

In young patients with advanced necrosis of the femoral head, the short- and medium-term results of total prosthesis arthroplasty are the most satisfactory. However, the prospect of aseptic loosening hangs over such arthroplasties like Damocles' sword. Reports from the literature suggest that, in addition to the age of the patient, there is also an endogenous factor that can be responsible not only for the etiology and pathogenesis of the necrosis, but also for the early loosening of the prosthesis. We have followed up 54 patients (73 hip joints) who had total hip replacement as a result of necrosis of the femoral head between 1976 and 1988. Altogether, 3 acetabular and 5 femoral shafts had to be replaced (7 patients). This corresponds to a loosening rate of 10% after an average of 4.9 years. Hence, the prosthesis changing rate is lower than that reported by other authors, but is still higher than in patients with coxarthrosis. Only 2 of 52 cemented shaft prostheses had to be replaced; the average age of these patients was 61.4 years. Of the 21 cement-free shaft implantations, 3 had to be replaced, the average age of these patients being 42.9 years. The fact that the average age of the latter patients was lower may be the reason for the revision rate not being significantly higher for the non-cemented shafts. In view of the fact that necrosis of the femoral head can rapidly result in the patient becoming an invalid if it is allowed to follow its natural course, hip joint prostheses should also be offered to younger patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Age Factors, Bone Cements, Anemia, Sickle Cell, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Kidney Transplantation, Prosthesis Failure, Femur Head Necrosis, Humans, Female, Hip Prosthesis, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!