Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Surgical debridement of gunshot wounds].

Authors: V A, Popov; V V, Vorob'ev;

[Surgical debridement of gunshot wounds].

Abstract

The authors conducted experimental (130 rabbits) and clinical studies (249 persons) in gunshot wounds of the soft tissues. It was found that in 29% of cases, primary surgical debridement of the gunshot wound failed to be a radical intervention because zones of secondary necrosis of the tissues developed on days 3-4. In view of this, gunshot wounds must be examined without fail on days 3-5 to determine the indications for repeated surgical debridement. The indications for repeated surgical debridement are as follows: foci of necrotic tissues, unopened pockets, the presence of foreign bodies. Repeated surgical debridement of a gunshot wound, when indicated, reduces the number of purulent complications by 4 times and the duration of treatment by 1.5 times.

Keywords

Necrosis, Time Factors, Debridement, Wound Infection, Animals, Humans, Wounds, Gunshot, Rabbits, Hindlimb, Leg Injuries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!