Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Median sternotomy scar assessment.

Authors: Hamesh, Jina; Jeremy, Simcock;

Median sternotomy scar assessment.

Abstract

Median sternotomy wounds are formed following most cardiac surgery. These wounds may heal with problematic scars. We hypothesise that midline sternotomy scars will scar poorly in general and in comparison with control scarring from other sites.We evaluated 50 patients with mature median sternotomy scars using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) and photographs. Different scar features were assessed using these scales.Patients were on average 65.9 years old, predominantly male (72%) and Caucasian (94%). Overall, 11 patients (22%) expressed concern over a symptomatic or poor scar with seven patients (14%) complaining of pruritis and three patients (6%) disappointed with the cosmesis of the scar. The clinician found five patients (10%) to have poor scarring defined as hypertrophic scarring. The predominant scarring characteristics assessed by the clinician were colouration, variable relief and increased contour which are the main areas of concern.Our study shows that median sternotomy scarring can be problematic with 1 in 5 patients symptomatic and 1 in 10 patients developing hypertrophic scarring. Thus, this predominantly Caucasion population has a low but significant rate of scar problems in comparison to median sternotomy scarring in other populations. We could not identify patient factors which were predictive for poor scarring but anatomical location may be a key factor. Overall, we believe that median sternotomy patients should be offered preventative treatment to ensure the best scar outcome.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Male, Wound Healing, Time Factors, Databases, Factual, Incidence, Middle Aged, Sternotomy, Cicatrix, Age Distribution, Humans, Female, Coronary Artery Bypass, Sex Distribution, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, New Zealand, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!