Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[A clinical review of pleurodesis for patients with poor performance status].

Authors: Katsutoshi, Ando; Yoshihiro, Ohkuni; Hideki, Makino; Akina, Komatsu; Ryo, Matsunuma; Kei, Nakashima; Nobuhiro, Asai; +1 Authors

[A clinical review of pleurodesis for patients with poor performance status].

Abstract

Although pleurodesis is an effective treatment for malignant pleural effusion, we hesitate to use in patients with poor performance status (PS) because of its side effects.Of 46 pleurodesis cases in our institution between 2006 and 2010, 24 poor PS cases (>3) were classified into 2 groups according to survival (beyond 3 months) or non-survival, and 3 groups according to condition: PS improved after pleurodesis, remained stable, or was exacerbated and we analyzed their backgrounds.Among the 24 cases (66.7%), there were 5 and 19 survival and non-survival cases. Patient backgrounds, characteristics of the lesions and examination results did not differ significantly among them. On the other hand, the ratio of successful initial pleurodesis in the exacerbated PS group was lower than in the improved and stable groups (16.7% vs. 100%, 87.5%). The 1- and 3-month survival rates of unsuccessful cases were lower than those of successful cases (33.3% vs. 77.8%, 0% vs. 32.4%).Success of initial pleurodesis can affect PS and outcome, thus it is important to improve the number of successful cases of initial pleurodesis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Pleurodesis, Aged, Pleural Effusion, Malignant, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!