
In a retrospective study about value of cerclage 160 patients with singleton pregnancies had been studied in two subgroups dependent from the moment of operative cervix closure and opposed a matched pair control group without cerclage. In both subgroups there is a more loaded obstetric history with reference to previous abortions. Preterm labour and premature rupture of membranes and tocolysis could be observed significantly more frequent in both subgroups than in the controls. Obstetric results are worse in the cerclage group with respect to birth weight, height and pregnancy duration, especially correlations between prognosis and opening of the womb at the moment of cerclage could be proved. Amniotic infection syndrome was three times more frequent in the cerclage group than in the controls. Contrary to the literature no increased frequency of cervical laceration or caesarean sections could be observed. In conclusion our results are contrary to the optimistic view on cerclage, important not only for indication, but also for instruction of patients before therapy.
Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Cervix Uteri, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Uterine Cervical Incompetence, Ligation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Retrospective Studies
Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Cervix Uteri, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Uterine Cervical Incompetence, Ligation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
