Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ridge preservation: does it actually work?

Authors: Ivan, Darby;

Ridge preservation: does it actually work?

Abstract

Post-extraction the alveolus undergoes modelling which reduces height and width. This may present a problem for subsequent crown and bridge or implant therapy. Ridge preservation is the use of grafts and/or membranes to try to minimize the loss of the alveolar ridge. Extraction sockets have been filled with autogenous, allogenic and alloplastic materials. Membranes or soft tissue were used to contain the graft. More recently biodegradable sponges and materials coated in growth factors have been tested. Studies have primarily looked at either maintenance of vertical and horizontal dimensions or the healing of the socket and how much of the graft material is incorporated into the newly formed bone. Irrespective of method or materials, there seems to be some maintenance of the alveolus. Bone fill seems to occur in preserved extraction sockets, but in most cases with a high percentage of residual graft particles. In general, there is a lack of evidence to show that ridge preservation aids in correct 3-D implant placement, maintains hard and soft tissue volume over a prolonged period of time or for success and survival of implants placed into ridge preserved sockets. Still the most effective way to maintain ridge volume is to keep the natural tooth.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Drug Carriers, Wound Healing, Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Alveolar Bone Loss, Membranes, Artificial, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Treatment Outcome, Bone Substitutes, Tooth Extraction, Alveolar Process, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Humans, Bone Remodeling, Tooth Socket

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!