Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Intacytoplasmic sperm injection: reproductive reality in couples with sterility].

Authors: Samuel, Hernández Ayup; Claudia del R, Balderas Rosales; Eric, Saucedo de la Llata; María Rosa, Moraga; Víctor, Batiza Reséndiz; Roberto, Santos Haliscak; Pedro, Galache Vega;

[Intacytoplasmic sperm injection: reproductive reality in couples with sterility].

Abstract

The intacytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the assisted reproduction technique (ART) that currently offers satisfactory results to infertile couples. The use of epididymal surgical retrieval (percutanean epydidimal sperm aspiration: PESA) and testicular sperm retrieval (testicular sperm extraction: TESE) combined with ICSI has come to bring a high response to azoospermic male.To communicate the results obtained from the Institute for the Study of Human Conception, in Monterrey, NL, with the application of the ICSI technique with ejaculate sperm and in azoospermic patients using sperm obtained from PESAor by testicular sperm extraction TESE.From January 1999 to December 2003 1,436 couples were studied at the Institute for the Study of Human Conception, Monterrey, Mexico; 729 cases underwent to ICSI (50.8%), 670 used the ejaculate sperm, in 37 cases (5%) PESA and 22 cases (3%) TESE. These patients were treated as usual: controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with FSHr alone or combined with HMG or LHr, use of GnRH analogs (agonist o antagonist), follicular monitoring up to the presence of 3 follicles longer than 18 mm; ovular retrieval 34 h after HGC application and embryo transfer in days 3 or 5 of development.No statistically significant difference was noted in the woman's age (p = 0.623), type and time of sterility (p = 0.446, 0.150), neither in FSH, LH and estradiol levels (p = 0.549, 0.623, 0.685). The middle age of the male had significant difference between PESA (38.9 +/- 7.3) and ejaculated sperm (36.1 +/- 6.4) (p = 0-024). The pregnancy rates among groups of the ejaculate sperm, PESA and TESE were 32.8%, 43.2% and 40.9% respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.327), neither in implantation rates: 11.2%, 26% and 11%, respectively (p = 0.153).The technique of ICSI and use of PESA and TESE offer satisfactory results in infertile couples, including azoospermic male.

Keywords

Adult, Epididymis, Male, Estradiol, Pregnancy Rate, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Luteinizing Hormone, Embryo Transfer, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Testis, Humans, Ejaculation, Female, Embryo Implantation, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Infertility, Male, Azoospermia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!