Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Application of colonic interposition in the digestive tract reconstruction after esophagectomy].

Authors: Lin, PENG; Yong-tao, HAN; Xiang, WANG; Wen-guang, XIAO; Qiang, FANG; Qiang, LI; Li-hua, CHEN;

[Application of colonic interposition in the digestive tract reconstruction after esophagectomy].

Abstract

To evaluate the safety of colonic interposition after esophagectomy.One hundred and thirty six patients with esophageal cancer underwent colonic interposition after esophagectomy in the Sichuan Tumor Hospital from October 1992 to October 2010. Clinical data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.Out of the 136 patients, 118 grafts were transverse colon in clockwise peristalsis supplied by ascending branches of the left colonic artery. Twelve grafts were right part of transverse colon and ascending colon in clockwise peristalsis. Six grafts were left part of transverse colon and descending colon in counterclockwise peristalsis. All the 18 grafts were supplied by the middle colonic artery. The total perioperative complication rate was 26.4% (36/136), including anastomotic leakage in 15 cases, colon necrosis in 5 cases. The mortality was 12.5%(17/136), in which 5 patients died of colonic perforation, 4 died of colon necrosis, 4 died of severe lung infection after operation, 3 died of ARDS and 1 died of systemic infection of unknown origin. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 2 patients, reflux in 2 cases, and 3 patients suffered from bowel dysmotility.Colon interposition is a complex procedure with significant trauma, high morbidity, and mortality. However, it is a valid alternative to reconstruct the gastrointestinal tract when the stomach is not feasible.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Colon, Anastomosis, Surgical, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Esophagectomy, Gastrointestinal Tract, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!