Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The reliability of ultrasound biometry].

Authors: U, Giers; C, Epple;

[The reliability of ultrasound biometry].

Abstract

Preoperative ultrasonic biometry is indispensible in cataract surgery in order to calculate the power of the intraocular lens to be implanted. Various authors have suggested that the accuracy of the measurements could be improved by performing biometry several times and basing the calculation of the lens on the mean value. The problem of the retest reliability of ultrasonic measurements was investigated in 99 young subjects with healthy eyes and 60 cataract patients. Biometry was performed three times consecutively in each mode using three different scanners and different coupling techniques. A comparison of the consecutive measurements showed good agreement (between r = 0.96 and r = 0.99) in regard to axial length and hence very good retest reliability. The accuracy of the repeat measurements was approximately the same with all three coupling methods used. The correlation coefficients of retest measurements of anterior chamber depth and lens thickness were much lower (r = 0.78 to r = 0.96). This may be explained by differences in handling of the probes, in the test modes, and in the physical conditions on which the measurements are based. In view of the good reproducibility of axial length measurements the authors consider one carefully performed biometry more valuable for preoperative calculation of lens power than the mean of several measurements.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Lenses, Intraocular, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Refraction, Ocular, Cataract, Tonometry, Ocular, Reference Values, Lens, Crystalline, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Aged, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!