Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The objective evaluation of sibilants].

Authors: S, Meyer; M, Ptok;

[The objective evaluation of sibilants].

Abstract

The inaccurate production of 's-sounds', i. e. sibilants represents the most common speech disorder. An objective description of such inaccurate speech sound production is mandatory. Several tools have been proposed and might be of great value, amongst them spectral analysis. The latter can nowadays be performed easily without the need for expensive equipment.Different sibilants were uttered either as isolated speech sounds or embedded in test words and sentences. These were then digitized and spectral analysis was performed. Since several protocols have been put forward on how to execute the spectral analysis of sibilants, we replicated those protocols and evaluated how they exert influence on the analysis results. The selection of time windows or frequency bands regarding the computation of spectral moments will be considered in particular.Sibilants are characterised by a band-pass noise. Usage of power spectral density functions for the extraction of features from temporal and spatial signals is a standard approach. Thus, we calculated spectral moments to describe noise signals derived from sibilant productions. We demonstrate differing results based on varying frequency and time analysis windows.Unfortunately to date there is no generally accepted "gold standard" for the spectro analysis of speech sounds. For clinical routine, we recommend using a time window of 40 ms around the temporal midpoint, extracted from utterances or words. It is important, however, that recording conditions and analysis parameters are identical pre- and post therapy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Sound Spectrography, Fourier Analysis, Speech Production Measurement, Phonetics, Humans, Articulation Disorders, Female, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!