
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 21587145
handle: 11570/2557454
Since its development in the 1980s, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has undergone a great deal of technological modifications. EUS has become an important tool in the evaluation of patients with various clinical disorders and is increasingly being utilized in many centers. EUS has been evolving over the years; EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for cytological and/or histological diagnosis has become standard practice and a wide array of interventional and therapeutic procedures are performed under EUS guidance for diseases which otherwise would have needed surgery, with its associated morbidities. EUS shares the risks and complications of other endoscopic procedures. This article addresses the specific adverse effects and risks associated with EUS, EUS-FNA and interventional EUS, namely perforation, bleeding, pancreatitis and infection. Measures to help minimizing these risks will also be discussed.
Evidence-Based Medicine, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Pancreatic Ducts, Hemorrhage, Bacterial Infections, Gallbladder Diseases, Peritonitis, Prognosis, Endosonography, Neoplasm Seeding, Pancreatitis, Intestinal Perforation, Risk Factors, Humans, Ultrasonography, Interventional
Evidence-Based Medicine, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Pancreatic Ducts, Hemorrhage, Bacterial Infections, Gallbladder Diseases, Peritonitis, Prognosis, Endosonography, Neoplasm Seeding, Pancreatitis, Intestinal Perforation, Risk Factors, Humans, Ultrasonography, Interventional
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
