
pmid: 21564456
handle: 1959.13/1313106
Pro re nata (PRN) or 'as required' medication is a regular part of mental health nursing practice. This retrospective study accessed data recorded for all PRN being given to patients within an eight-bed psychiatric intensive care unit. Data from the same consecutive 4-month period from 2005 and from 2007-2009 were analysed for trends in overall rates, time of administration, and type of medication given. PRN administration was identified to each patient, but no demographic information was analysed. Results of this study demonstrated a gradual decline in the total number of PRN given, reducing from an average of 314 PRN per month in 2005, to 181 PRN per month in 2009. The typical number of patients per month receiving any PRN did not change, with 41 out of a total of 72 patients receiving at least one PRN in 2005, and 40 out of 64 patients receiving PRN in 2009. These results suggest that over the study timeframe, nurses became more selective as to which patients received PRN. This discussion examined the possible reasons for this result, including unit leadership style, changes in staffing levels, a new nursing model and group programme, and the relocation to a new facility.
mental health nursing, Psychotropic Drugs, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Mental Disorders, psychiatric intensive care, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, pro re nata, Intensive Care Units, Humans, as required, Retrospective Studies
mental health nursing, Psychotropic Drugs, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Mental Disorders, psychiatric intensive care, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, pro re nata, Intensive Care Units, Humans, as required, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
