Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure.

Authors: Bonnie Lee, Molloy;

Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure.

Abstract

Postoperative visual loss (POVL) is a rare but catastrophic complication after nonocular surgery. Previously POVL has been reported in lengthy, prone, lateral, or cardiopulmonary cases, with extreme blood loss, hemodilution, and hypotension. The author's index case of POVL following a lengthy operation in steep Trendelenburg position (ST) prompted study of the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and time spent in ST. A 3-year investigation of the relationship between IOP and ST procedures is reported. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated from IOP and MAP in supine position and at 30-minute intervals during ST. At start of surgery, IOP of 37 patients ranged from 9 to 28 mm Hg. At 120 minutes, IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mm Hg. The OPP ranged from 50 to 82 mm Hg at start of surgery and from 21 to 75 mm Hg after 120 minutes. Increased IOP and reductions in OPP in relationship to position change were statistically significant (P < .001), with OPP falling below IOP in 10 cases. Findings suggest a relationship between prolonged ST and reduced OPP, challenging the accepted view that cerebral and ophthalmic circulatory autoregulation prevents elevated compartment pressures and reductions in perfusion.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Vision, Low, Middle Aged, Head-Down Tilt, Intraoperative Period, Tonometry, Ocular, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure, Aged, Nurse Anesthetists

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
49
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!