Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors: F, Rüfer;

[Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Abstract

Reliable measurements of the intraocular pressure (IOP) are necessary for glaucoma patients. The measuring procedure, anatomical changes of the eye or extraocular influences can lead to errors during applanation tonometry. The IOP is overestimated if measured through the wrong eyepiece of the slit lamp, if a force is interfering with the tonometer arm during the measurement, if the lid comes into contact with the tonometer tip, if blepharospasm occurs, if there is lid retraction or if a Valsalva maneuver is present. An underestimation of the IOP occurs if staining with fluorescein is absent or insufficient, if the illumination is not bright enough, if a corneal stromal edema is present, after LASIK, during accommodation, during repeated measures within a few minutes or during systemic blood pressure drop. Discrepancies of the IOP in both directions can appear if the calibration of the tonometer is irregular, if abnormal central corneal thickness or astigmatism is present. For correct measurements calibrations are advised once or twice a year.

Keywords

Manometry, Risk Factors, Contrast Media, Humans, Fluorescein, Glaucoma, Diagnostic Errors, Intraocular Pressure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!