
pmid: 21477258
With the introduction of new biological agents for cancer treatment enabling 'personalized medicine', treatment decisions based on the molecular features of the tumour are more common. Consequently, tissue evaluation in tumour pathology is becoming increasingly based on a combination of classical morphological and molecular analysis. The results of diagnostic tests rely not only on the quality of the method used but, to a large extent, also on the quality of specimens, which is dependent on the pre-analytical procedures and storage. With the introduction of predictive immunohistochemical and molecular tests in clinical pathology, improvement and standardization of pre-analytical procedures has become crucial. The aim of this review is to increase awareness with regard to tissue handling and for standardization of the pre-analytical phase of a diagnostic process. In addition, several processing steps in tissue handling that need to be improved in order to obtain the quality needed for modern molecular medicine will be discussed. Optimal, standardized procedures are crucial if a high standard of test results is to be achieved, which is what each patient deserves.
Contains fulltext : 98236.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Pathology, Clinical, Tissue Fixation, Histological Techniques, ONCOL 3: Translational research NCMLS 3: Tissue engineering and pathology, ONCOL 3: Translational research IGMD 9: Renal disorder, ONCOL 3: Translational research, Neoplasms, Humans, Tissue Preservation, Precision Medicine
Pathology, Clinical, Tissue Fixation, Histological Techniques, ONCOL 3: Translational research NCMLS 3: Tissue engineering and pathology, ONCOL 3: Translational research IGMD 9: Renal disorder, ONCOL 3: Translational research, Neoplasms, Humans, Tissue Preservation, Precision Medicine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
