Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[A comparison of different methods of calculating clearances using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine and 123I- or 131I-ortho-iodohippuric acid].

Authors: U, Keske; M, Cordes; N, Hosten; D, Roll; J, Hunger; R, Felix;

[A comparison of different methods of calculating clearances using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine and 123I- or 131I-ortho-iodohippuric acid].

Abstract

Using labelled MAG3 (n = 172) or OIH (n = 102) the results of three different techniques of calculating renal clearance were compared. The following techniques were used: Tauxe (single plasma concentration determination), Oberhausen (modified, combined partial body and plasma disappearance clearance) and Winkler (partial body clearance). For OIH, linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation of Tauxe and Oberhausen clearances with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.90 and a mean ratio (mean) Oberhausen/Tauxe clearances of 1.03. For MAG3, the Oberhausen values were found to be significantly lower than the Tauxe values with an equally good correlation. For this radiopharmaceutical the Winkler values were significantly higher than the Tauxe and Oberhausen values. For OIH, no such difference was noted. However, the correlation coefficient was significantly lower. Whereas with the Tauxe method, a mean ratio MAG3-/OIH clearances of 0.62 was observed in an earlier investigation, from the present data a ratio of 0.53 is calculated for the Oberhausen clearance. The difference between the Tauxe and Oberhausen clearances with MAG3 is of importance when comparing clearance values obtained with clearance calculation techniques and for establishing normal values for the MAG3 clearance.

Keywords

Adult, Iodine Radioisotopes, Male, Humans, Technetium, Female, Iodohippuric Acid, Organotechnetium Compounds, Middle Aged, Oligopeptides, Radioisotope Renography, Technetium Tc 99m Mertiatide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!