
At present, attenuation values reported on the hearing protection device (HPD) label are strongly overestimated due to an evaluation method inappropriate for the environments in which they have to be used: the workplaces. An alternative test protocol was validated and published as standard. It should be transposed in the regulatory and legislative scenario and then adopted by manufacturers. Meanwhile, derating schemes proposed by NIOSH may be applied for reducing the labelled attenuation data, in spite of their roughness. Moreover, attenuation values differ from subject to subject. Especially when exposure levels are high or hearing loss is worsening, it could thus be necessary to evaluate the attenuation provided by the hearing protector on each worker. To overcome this problem, the assessment of the hearing threshold levels on a subject with and without the HPD could be integrated into the annual audiometry program.
Italy, Occupational Exposure, Noise, Occupational, Humans, Ear Protective Devices
Italy, Occupational Exposure, Noise, Occupational, Humans, Ear Protective Devices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
