Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Adequacy of personal hearing protection devices].

Authors: A, Peretti; F, Pedrielli; A Pasqua, di Bisceglie; F, Bonomini;

[Adequacy of personal hearing protection devices].

Abstract

At present, attenuation values reported on the hearing protection device (HPD) label are strongly overestimated due to an evaluation method inappropriate for the environments in which they have to be used: the workplaces. An alternative test protocol was validated and published as standard. It should be transposed in the regulatory and legislative scenario and then adopted by manufacturers. Meanwhile, derating schemes proposed by NIOSH may be applied for reducing the labelled attenuation data, in spite of their roughness. Moreover, attenuation values differ from subject to subject. Especially when exposure levels are high or hearing loss is worsening, it could thus be necessary to evaluate the attenuation provided by the hearing protector on each worker. To overcome this problem, the assessment of the hearing threshold levels on a subject with and without the HPD could be integrated into the annual audiometry program.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Italy, Occupational Exposure, Noise, Occupational, Humans, Ear Protective Devices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!