Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Biparietal diameter/femur length ratio, cephalic index, and femur length measurements: not reliable screening techniques for Down syndrome.

Authors: Y G, Shah; C J, Eckl; S K, Stinson; J R, Woods;

Biparietal diameter/femur length ratio, cephalic index, and femur length measurements: not reliable screening techniques for Down syndrome.

Abstract

Previous published reports have shown that fetuses affected with Down syndrome have normal biparietal diameter (BPD), high BPD-to-femur length ratio, and shorter femur length and occipitofrontal diameter. A retrospective comparison of the BPD, occipitofrontal diameter, cephalic index, femur length, and BPD/femur length ratio was made between 17 fetuses with Down syndrome diagnosed prenatally by second-trimester amniocentesis and 17 matched controls. The gestational age at sonographic evaluation in the two groups ranged from 15-23 weeks. The results of this study show no significant differences in the BPD, occipitofrontal diameter, cephalic index, femur length, and BPD/femur length ratio in the Down syndrome group when compared with controls. The sensitivity of BPD/femur length ratio as a screening technique for Down syndrome in this study was 18%, with a specificity of 94%. This sonographic method does not appear to be a useful screening parameter for Down syndrome.

Keywords

Cephalometry, Gestational Age, Fetus, Predictive Value of Tests, Occipital Bone, Prenatal Diagnosis, Frontal Bone, Amniocentesis, Humans, Mass Screening, Regression Analysis, Femur, Down Syndrome, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    40
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
40
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!