
Drug testing outside the laboratory environment has become widespread and provides presumptive results within minutes of collection of the specimen. This has become particularly useful for testing of urine and oral fluid. Applications include workplaces where drug use has safety implications, drivers of vehicles at the roadside and situations where drug impairment is suspected. The present article explores the relative advantages of this form of testing for the specimens that can be collected and discusses issues such as cut-offs, the need for laboratory confirmation and safeguards to ensure legal defensibility.
Immunoassay, Illicit Drugs, Forensic Sciences, Reproducibility of Results, Urine, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Specimen Handling, Substance Abuse Detection, Law Enforcement, Humans, Saliva
Immunoassay, Illicit Drugs, Forensic Sciences, Reproducibility of Results, Urine, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Specimen Handling, Substance Abuse Detection, Law Enforcement, Humans, Saliva
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
