Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Laser nephelometry. A better methodology?].

Authors: M, Gaytán-Alcocér;

[Laser nephelometry. A better methodology?].

Abstract

Nephelometric assays (LN) are known since several years ago. Laser beam immunonephelometric analysis (He-Ne: 640 nm), are a sophistication of the spectrophotometers. Nephelometry was the first method to make use of narrow-angle light scattering and a laser beam. It was made 2500 +/- 200 determinations of human fluids for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C4, both LN and RID (radial immunodiffusion method). Human patients had the following characteristics: 18-55 years old, both sexes and with different pulmonary pathologies (Bronchial asthma, Bronchitis, Tuberculosis, Emphysema, Fibrosis, Extrinsic allergic alveolitis). We found a greater sensitivity and a shorter analysis time for LN than for RID. On the other hand, Nephelometry gave different values to the radial immunodiffusion method for all the proteins evaluated.

Keywords

Adult, Lung Diseases, Male, Immunodiffusion, Adolescent, Immune Sera, Lasers, Immunoglobulins, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Complement System Proteins, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!