Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Assessing the quality of quality indicators].

Authors: G, Blumenstock;

[Assessing the quality of quality indicators].

Abstract

Quality in healthcare is not directly observable and measurable. Quality indicators serve as a tool for operationalizing quality of care. Different quality measures are required depending on the purpose, context, and audience concerned. The methodological quality of the indicators themselves has to be critically assessed. Various quality requirements for indicators have been published and can be described based on the steps of the developmental process. Importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility are reported as basic criteria for assessment. The QUALIFY instrument offers a standardized approach for assessing quality indicators and reflects best current practice. Measuring quality through indicators is no end in itself. The effect of measurement on motivating quality improvement must be evaluated in future studies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Evidence-Based Medicine, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Germany, Delivery of Health Care, Quality Indicators, Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    29
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
29
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!