Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems.

Authors: D F, Rigsby; D H, Retief; C M, Russell; F R, Denys;

Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems.

Abstract

Standardized cylindrical Class V preparations, 3 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm deep, were made on the roots of 60 extracted human maxillary permanent canines. The teeth were restored with Scotchbond 2/Silux (S); Gluma/Lumifor (G); and Tenure/Perfection (T), respectively. The root apices were sealed with Copalite/amalgam and two coats of nail varnish applied to the teeth except for 1 mm around the restorations. For the qualitative microleakage evaluation the teeth were thermocycled x500 in 0.5% basic fuchsin between 8 degrees C and 50 degrees C and for the quantitative microleakage evaluation in 2% methylene blue solution. The marginal gap dimensions were measured on cylindrical restorations placed on the facial surfaces of ground root surfaces of 30 teeth. Epoxy replicas were made of the restorations, coated with gold/palladium and examined with the SEM. The maximum marginal gap dimensions were measured. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Duncan's and their nonparametric analogues. In the qualitative microleakage evaluation the total microleakage was: S: 16; G: 50; T: 18. The quantitative microleakage (micrograms) was: S: 3.1 +/- 2.9; G: 16.1 +/- 5.3; T: 4.4 +/- 4.1. The maximum marginal gap dimensions (microns) were: S: 4.1 +/- 3.6; G: 9.3 +/- 3.4; T: 16.4 +/- 7.0.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Leakage, Analysis of Variance, Cuspid, Oxalates, Nitrates, Surface Properties, Dental Bonding, Maleates, Dental Cements, In Vitro Techniques, Composite Resins, Nitric Acid, Resin Cements, Polymethacrylic Acids, Glutaral, Dentin, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Methacrylates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!