
handle: 2123/33409
This study explores the potential of integrating non-mobility services within the Mobility-as-a- Service (MaaS) framework, focusing on their impact on user adoption and the scalability of multiservice bundles. Using a stated choice experiment informed by semi-structured interviews, the research examines user preferences for multiservices. The findings indicate a strong preference for a pay-as-you-go option, with flexibility being a key driver of adoption across diverse demographic groups. While markets for multiservice bundles evidently exist, the overall reception of non-mobility services is mixed. The results suggest that the success of non-mobility services in scaling up MaaS depends heavily on multiservice design and market segmentations. We estimate the willingness to pay for non-mobility services, with gamified reward schemes standing out as the most promising factor to deliver scalability.
Multiservice, Willingness-to-pay, Australia, Mobility as a Service (MaaS), choice experiment, Mobility bundles
Multiservice, Willingness-to-pay, Australia, Mobility as a Service (MaaS), choice experiment, Mobility bundles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
