Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evolution of apical formation on immature necrotic permanent teeth.

Authors: Asunción Mendoza, Mendoza; Enrique Solano, Reina; Franklin, García-Godoy;

Evolution of apical formation on immature necrotic permanent teeth.

Abstract

To evaluate the evolution of apical formation on 28 necrotic immature permanent teeth treated with calcium hydroxide at different stages of root development.Apical formation in 28 necrotic incisors was carried out (27 upper and one lower incisors), in children between the ages of 6 and 13 years old (11 males, 10 females). Following anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, the chamber was opened and the coronal and root pulp tissue was removed. Next, after measuring the canal, the root canal was irrigated with 5% sodium hypochlorite. Once the canal was dried, it was filled with the CaOH2 powder mixed with physiologic saline solution to a dense consistency but malleable. This paste was compressed into the canal using a cotton pellet. The canal was completely filled up to the apex. Finally, the cavity opening was sealed with zinc oxide-eugenol (IRM) and glass-ionomer (Vitrebond). Follow-up appointments were made every 3 months in order to evaluate the evolution of the periapical radiolucency and the formation of the apical barrier.The duration of the apical induction was 8.6 +/- 5.36 months. Increase or lack of growth in the length of the root canal and the type of root end closing was as follows: cementoid tissue (85.72%); osseous tissue (14.28%), with a 100% overall success rate. The evolution of these teeth was monitored over a 2-year period with re-infections occurring in 7.1 percent of the cases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Cementum, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Adolescent, Apexification, Statistics, Nonparametric, Calcium Hydroxide, Incisor, Root Canal Filling Materials, Treatment Outcome, Tooth Apex, Glass Ionomer Cements, Root Canal Obturation, Dental Pulp Necrosis, Humans, Female, Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement, Child, Root Canal Preparation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!