Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2117/76301
Self-compacting concrete has proved itself to be a suitable solution in many scopes of construction industry. Its higher performance and better flowability has allowed considering its use in new applications. Nevertheless, the brittleness commonly associated to concrete is still present even though it may be compensated with the use of fibres. Several methods included in different guidelines propose tests in order to characterize fibre reinforced concrete, although some of them present some drawbacks concerning the execution of material consumption. The goal of this document is to briefly show the main characterization tests and provide an initial vision of the potential possibilities the use of alternative tests can offer. In this study the three-point bending test, the Barcelona test and the inductive method are described and correlated. In this concern, the results of an experimental campaign which consisted of nine mixtures that included both steel and plastic fibres were analysed in terms of correlating the results obtained between tests. Correlation factors above 0.85 were obtained, proving that an approach to standardised methods by means of non-standardised tests is possible.
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures::Materials i estructures de formigó, :Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures::Materials i estructures de formigó [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Formigó autocompactant, Self-consolidating concrete
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures::Materials i estructures de formigó, :Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures::Materials i estructures de formigó [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Formigó autocompactant, Self-consolidating concrete
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 58 |

Views provided by UsageCounts