Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2117/361986
Electromechanical couplings play an important role in our day to day lives, as they are present in both natural biological systems and technological applications. Piezoelectricity, the two way coupling between strain and polarization, is one of the most well-known and used mechanism behind electromechanical transduction. This effect is only present in a limited number of materials which are non-centrosymmetric in their atomic structure. Although widely used, piezoelectric materials have important limitations such as their limited operational temperature or their brittleness. In addition, the best and most widely used piezoelectrics have large contents of lead and are thus bioincompatible and unsuited for many biomedical applications due to its toxicity. There exists another electromechanical mechanism far less studied and understood, flexoelectricity, which couples the strain gradient to the polarization, and conversely polarization gradient to strain. Despite piezoelectricity, flexoelectricity is not restricted by symmetry requirements and is therefore a universal property of all dielectrics. Flexoelectricity is noticeable only at small scales where sufficiently large strain and polarization gradients are attainable. Flexoelectricity thus broadens the class of available materials for electromechanical transduction applications and overcomes the limitations of piezoelectric materials, provided that sufficiently small fabrication sizes are achieved. Nevertheless, flexoelectricity has not yet been widely exploited in technology. Towards this goal, new promising piezoelectric metamaterials have been recently proposed which achieve significant apparent piezoelectricity by mobilizing and upscaling the flexoelectric response of small scale non-piezoelectric constituents. The design premise is that the atomic non-centrosymmetry required for apparent piezoelectricity can be replaced by geometrical polarization, i.e. by a noncentrosymmetric material architecture. The performance of these geometrically polarized metamaterials designs is shown to compete in some situations with that of the best known and widely used piezoelectrics and it is expected that it can be further improved through shape optimization. Here, we perform a systematic shape optimization analysis of some recently proposed piezoelectric like metamaterials based on flexoelectricity. Geometric features, lattice orientation and material parameters are optimized in order to maximize four different measures of the apparent piezoelectric response. A rational study of the optimized structure is performed in order to (1) extract the essential design concepts, (2) simplify the geometrical structures and (3) ease future manufacturing. The performance of the optimized designs is compared against two well-known piezoelectrics.
metamaterials, Metamaterials, :Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes numèrics [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Piezoelectricity, :Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], piezoelectric, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes numèrics, Piezoelectricitat, electromechanical couplings, strain and polarization
metamaterials, Metamaterials, :Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes numèrics [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Piezoelectricity, :Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], piezoelectric, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes numèrics, Piezoelectricitat, electromechanical couplings, strain and polarization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 66 | |
| downloads | 41 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts