Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2117/173894
Brevity and frequency are two crucial factors in the processes of statistical learning. The compression principle had already been used previously to explain the origin of Zipf’s law for the frequency of words. Here we use a model from information theory to also explain the Zipf’s law of abbreviation, or the statistical tendency of more frequent elements in language to be shorter (in characters in the case of written language, and in time durations for oral communication). As far as we know, we show for the first time that Zipf’s law of abbreviation is a global speech process that holds in words regardless of what are the linguistics units of study. In addition, the derived model from information theory allows us to fit empirically linguistic data considering both acoustic elements (phonemes, words and sentences) and its transcripts. This raises that the processes measured in units of written text are a byproduct of spontaneous speech patterns. The more a word is used, the greatest effort in compression that will make it shorter; but also the shorter it is, the more times it will be used statistically. This work paves the way for new experimental approaches to the study of statistical learning.
Peer Reviewed
Statistical Learning, Brevity law, Zipf's law of Abbreviation, Information Theory, Speech, Computational linguistics, Buckeye Corpus, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Llenguatge natural, :Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Llenguatge natural [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Lingüística computacional -- Mètodes estadístics
Statistical Learning, Brevity law, Zipf's law of Abbreviation, Information Theory, Speech, Computational linguistics, Buckeye Corpus, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Llenguatge natural, :Informàtica::Intel·ligència artificial::Llenguatge natural [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Lingüística computacional -- Mètodes estadístics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 44 |

Views provided by UsageCounts