Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2117/121216
End-user feedback is becoming more important for the evolution of software systems. There exist various communication channels for end-users (app stores, social networks) which allow them to express their experiences and requirements regarding a software application. End-users communicate a large amount of feedback via these channels which leads to open issues regarding the use of end-user feedback for software development, maintenance and evolution. This includes investigating how to identify relevant feedback scattered across different feedback channels and how to determine the priority of the feedback issues communicated. In this research preview paper, we discuss ideas for enduser driven feedback prioritization.
Peer Reviewed
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Enginyeria del software, End-user feedback, :Informàtica::Enginyeria del software [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Enginyeria de requisits, Requirements engineering, End-user involvement, Requirements prioritization
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Enginyeria del software, End-user feedback, :Informàtica::Enginyeria del software [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Enginyeria de requisits, Requirements engineering, End-user involvement, Requirements prioritization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 92 | |
| downloads | 52 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts