Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cadaver retransplants.

Authors: K, Ogura; J M, Cecka;

Cadaver retransplants.

Abstract

1. Second-graft survival rates were 67% at 1 year and declined to 40% at 5 years, consistently 10% lower than those of first grafts. First- and third-graft survival rates were 77% and 58% at 1 year, respectively. The difference was apparent at 3 months. 2. Second transplants with good 1-month function had an 82% 1-year graft survival rate compared to 86% for first transplants. With good 3-month function, they had 89% 1-year survival, comparable to 91% for first transplants. 3. First-graft duration had a high prognostic value for second-graft survival. Second transplants with first-graft duration less than 3 months had 57% 1-year graft survival whereas those with more than 12 months had 75% 1-year survival. The difference was significant up to 5 years. Half-life after 1 year was 5.9 for acute responders and 5.3 for chronic responders. 4. The FCXM was a useful screening tool for second transplants. Second transplants with positive FCXM had 61% 3-month survival and those with a negative crossmatch had 82%. A positive FCXM with short first-graft duration had 48% 3-month survival and should be a contraindication for retransplantation. 5. Responder status was associated with HLA-mismatches in the first transplants. The 0-HLA-mismatched first grafts resulted in acute responders for 45-58%, which was significantly lower than 62-69% of totally HLA-mismatched first grafts. Totally HLA-mismatched first grafts were related to 3-18% lower survival for acute responders. 6. Acute responders benefited more from HLA matching than chronic responders. In acute responders, 0-HLA-A,B-mismatched grafts had a 72% 1-year graft survival rate, and 4 mis-matched had 58%. At 3 years, they had 59% and 42%, respectively. 7. HLA-DR1 recipient phenotype was associated with a 10-15% increased survival rate. DR1-positive recipients had 73% 1-year survival compared to 63% of DR1-negative recipients. 8. Never-transfused second-transplant recipients had a 59% 1-year survival rate compared to 69% for transfused. Transfusions of 1-4 units were sufficient to obtain a transfusion effect. 9. The antihuman immunoglobulin crossmatch test was associated with a 3-8% better 2-year graft survival in first and second transplants. There was no short-term beneficial effect. This assay might have detected false-negative crossmatch cases not seen by NIH or one-wash.

Keywords

Histocompatibility Testing, Graft Survival, Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity, HLA-DR1 Antigen, Kidney Transplantation, United States, Phenotype, Cadaver, Humans, Blood Transfusion, Registries, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!